UAS Sustainability Survey

Some Background Information:

Historically, Juneau has been a relatively “green” city: about 98% of the power needs in Juneau have been produced from hydroelectricity, an energy source which involves the minimal release of greenhouse gases. Only a very small portion has historically been produced by the burning of fossil fuels like petroleum-based diesel. Juneau’s loads reached average capacity of existing hydro resources in 2007.


Source: AELP
In 2008, a low run-off year, demand has consistently exceeded hydroelectric capacity, consequently increasing our reliance on diesel burning by up to 5% of total power production and driving up residential and commercial utility rates. The future will likely be a “mixed bag” for hydroelectric power generation in Juneau. A new hydroelectricity project, Lake Dorothy Phase I, which is under construction and is expected to be on line by 2009, is anticipated to add about 20% capacity to serve Juneau area needs for the next 10-15 years. Beyond that, however, Phase II of the Lake Dorothy project and future potential hydro projects are expected to be relatively expensive, and construction costs will likely be passed on to the consumer. Moreover, climate change could affect future hydroelectric capacity. In 2007 and 2008, we observed lower than average hydroelectric capacity during late fall and winter, a period during which electric loads for heating homes and businesses typically increase. If these recent conditions reflect the consequences of human-induced climate change, climate change could continue to have significant impacts on Juneau energy sources. However, if individuals, institutions, and businesses in Juneau were willing to invest in energy saving technologies, implement policies and incentives for sustainable practices, and/or modify personal energy consumption habits, then it is likely that 100% of the electricity produced and consumed in the Juneau area could be derived from hydro power. For instance, if one-half the residential households in Juneau reduced power consumption by ~23% -- a preliminary estimate -- Juneau could refrain from fossil fuel burning in the future, assuming little change in commercial demand. The UAS Sustainability Initiative is a campus committee of student, faculty, and staff that discuss, research, and educate on sustainability in Southeast Alaska. A workshop – “Juneau Energy: The Next 25 years” will be sponsored for the community by the UAS Sustainability Initiative and several partners on Friday, April 4, 2008. The results of this survey will be presented at this workshop.

Sources and Additional Resources:

AELP information about the consequences of diesel use: http://www.aelp.com/energy/energyupdates.htm

EPRI Report about Southeast Alaska Tidal Power: http://www.aidea.org/AEA/PDF%20files/EPRI-SETidalResourceReport1-07-2007.pdf

Alaska International Polar Year: http://www.alaska.edu/ipy/

CBJ Report on Predicted Impacts on Juneau by Climate Change: http://www.juneau.org/clerk/boards/Climate_Change/CBJ%20_Climate_Report_Final.pdf 

  1. How long have you lived in Juneau?

  2.  
  3. I am a:




  4.  
  5. What is your gender?



  6.  
  7. What is your highest level of education?








  8.  
  9. I live in:




  10.  
  11. Are you a business owner?



  12.  
  13. Achieving the goal of having 100% of local electricity generated in Juneau by hydro power is important
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  14.  
  15. I believe that the first consideration in addressing this issue is:




  16.  
  17. I would be willing to change my personal energy consumption habits to achieve this goal
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  18.  
  19. I believe that global warming is a real phenomenon and that it is either caused or exacerbated by human activities such as burning fossil fuels
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  20.  
  21. I would be willing to: Reduce the length of hot-water showers by 25%
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  22.  
  23. I would be willing to: turn my electric water heater down to 3/4 of its current temperature setting
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  24.  
  25. I would be willing to: reduce thermostats on any electric baseboard heaters by 2 degrees
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  26.  
  27. I would be willing to: reduce the number of lights in my house by 25%
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  28.  
  29. I would be willing to: replace 50% of conventional (incandescent) light bulbs in my house with energy efficient (compact fluorescent) bulbs
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  30.  
  31. I would be willing to: install timers or power strips on electronic devices to completely power off electronic appliances
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  32.  
  33. I would be willing to: increase the temperature setting 10-20% in my refrigerator and modify my grocery buying or food storage habits accordingly
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  34.  
  35. I would be willing to: reduce washer and dryer power consumption by modifying my behavior (e.g. air-drying some of my clothes, washing only full loads, cold water washing, washing less frequently)
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  36.  
  37. I would be willing to: Pay for an electric power meter in my house to monitor my personal energy consumption
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  38.  
  39. I would be willing to: use a portion of my 2007 PFD or 2007 federal tax rebate on improving household energy efficiency.
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  40.  
  41. I would be willing to: spend an additional $50.00 from my monthly income to increase energy efficiency in my house
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  42.  
  43. The other members of my household consider energy efficiency to be important
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  44.  
  45. I would be willing to approach my supervisor or my employees about reducing power consumption in my workplace.)
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  46.  
  47. I would avoid shopping at department stores/businesses that have wasteful energy practices
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  48.  
  49. I would support an initiative to certify businesses for energy efficiency so I can choose where to shop
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  50.  
  51. I would support a tax, surcharge, or staged electric rate for individual households that exceed a maximum electric consumption level for their type of house
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  52.  
  53. I would support higher electric rates for tourism-based industries (cruise ships, etc.) that draw local Juneau electric power
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  54.  
  55. I would support using a portion of tax revenue as incentives for businesses to improve energy practices
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  56.  
  57. I would support reduced business hours at stores to reduce commercial energy consumption
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  58.  
  59. I would support a portion of the proceeds from my electric bill to hire public staff that can conduct commercial and household energy audits
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  60.  
  61. I would be seriously interested in investing in household wind-turbine, solar panel, or alternative fuel technology to supplement my power needs
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  62.  
  63. I would be seriously interested in buying an electric vehicle in the next 10-15 years
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  64.  
  65. I would support a shift to Juneau public transportation (local buses, etc.) that can run off electric power
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  66.  
  67. I would be seriously interested in having local and state governments invest in environmentally sensitive form of tidal power, wind power, or hydrogen power technology for Juneau
    Strongly Disagree
    1 2 3 4 5
    Strongly Agree
  68.  
  69. Thank you for completing this survey.  Are there any other thoughts or comments you would like to share?

  70.  

This is an anonymous survey. Your name will not be provided to the survey author.

Powered by UAS Online © 2008 University of Alaska